I suppose you were in contact with Lutz. Our policy is to render what's mapped and in that be quick to market. If there's a tagging found sufficiently often it is considered for inclusion in the historic map. The wiki page "map features" describes what kind of tagging is depicted in OUR map. It does not describe what some pseudo-official tagging proposal came up to. We gave up in waiting for tagging discussions coming to a final solution. Usually they tend to become endless discussions without a final consensus.

And I definitely don't consider 10-20 positive votes for a successful proposal to be in any way representative for the community of tens of thousands of active mappers or more. However, when a proposal leads to another tagging being accepted by the community in a considerable way we are eager to include it on our map.

Cheers,
Zecke


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to