On 14/12/2009, at 7:10 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:03 PM, James Livingston <doc...@mac.com> wrote: >> I'm sure that there was a tag for the first, although I can't find it now. >> Something like leisure=club_rooms or similar, which related to a sporting >> group but wasn't necessarily where the sports themselves were played, which >> would be leisure=sports_centre/pitch. Possibly I just made it up when I >> tagged some. > > I like the sound of club_rooms. Or I was going to propose club_house, > but yours is better.
I'm not fussed on the wording, but I think something for clubs would be good. You could probably use it for things like scout halls and so on too, if there isn't a tag for that already. > It would also be nice to have club= for the whole ground including any > pitches. So a bowling club might have club=yes, sport=bowls, > name=Fobar Bowls club, on the whole area. Then, leisure=pitch, > sport=bowls on the bowling green. Then amenity=club_rooms for the > building with restaurants etc inside. There is a "site" relation which might work here, maybe something like relation: type=site, name=Foobar Bowls Club way: leisure=pitch; sport=bowls way: amenity=club_rooms; building=yes >> The lines are a bit messy, but my understanding is that basically: >> * if you can only get drinks with a meal, it's amenity=restaurant >> * if you can't get a meal (only snacks) it's amenity=bar >> * if you can get either without the other it's amenity=pub > > Oh, interesting. I had thought the pub/bar distinction was just the > usual fuzzy one: bars are more upmarket. "Officially" it probably is fuzzy, but someone described that distinction to me once (on #osm I think) and it seemed to make sense to me. Of course you get the places which are a restaurant during the day and some nights, and become a bar on Friday/Saturday night, but it mostly works. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au