On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 19:32, <osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:
> I assume these National parks where different rules are in effect have a > boundary relation. > > > > In which case it would be possible to either: > > > > a) tag a def: directly on that boundary relation with the rules that apply > or (maybe better in this case) > b) create a type=defaults relation “Tasmania National Parks Defaults” with > all the defaults that apply in national parks, then add that relation to > any national park boundary relation where it applies as member with the > role of defaults > > (b) is basically following the defaults proposal exactly, and allows to > define the defaults once and the re-use them for all national parks. > A problem with that would be that in a number of cases that I know of, you can ride a bike along the roads *into* the National Park, but you can't then take your bike onto the walking tracks, so a Park-wide default may not work? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
