But per
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Updates/2011-03-07#ODbL_phase_3_delayed_due_to_Creative_Commons,
phase 3 has been delayed. Or has this changed?
Sam
On 11-03-26 05:18 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 26/03/11 04:03, Samuel Dyck wrote:
Let me clarify, will the so called tainted data still be up for the near
future, or will I be spending my week preforming hectic Canvec imports
to save street names I gathered with a pen and paper? It doesn't look
good for me
<http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=12&lat=49.88177&lon=-97.17517&layers=B0>.
Please ignore Sam - there is no data removal planned for next week.
I think he has confused the stages of the license change process - the
next stage is to ask people to accept or decline the license before
they can edit.
It is not the point at which the license will change and problem data
may have to be removed. It is not even the point at which people who
decline will not be able to edit any more.
More details about the implementation plan can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Implementation_Plan
As I understand things it is Phase 3 which we are close to entering,
not Phase 5.
Tom
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
