LWG blog post about CC-BY https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
as long as you have explicit permission to add data from city. It become compatible. I used "may" as in "should remain on the list because explicit permission was already obtained." On Jan 28, 2018 5:53 PM, "OSM Volunteer stevea" <stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote: On Jan 28, 2018, at 2:39 PM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > CC Attribution is compatible with explicit permission, so Gatineau and Montreal may remain on the list..... Oh, how I sometimes dislike the word "may!" I know, I know, our good talk-ca dialog intends to help wider understanding and consensus. This can be challenging, lengthy, repeat-oriented / loquacious and seem like it runs in circles! It gets better. James, I hereby ask you to change status from red to green once you know. Perhaps also undo the strikeout type (delete the <del> brackets in the markup language) in Contributors for those two cities, too (updating the one or two lines of text it takes to do that). That goes for anybody posting here and/or reading this. To all, wiki what you know, please! Though, sometimes, conversations here, or in email, or "in the map" or... are more appropriate. I'm saying "wiki when wiki is right." SteveA
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca