Great, seems like we have a list of 3 ok ones:
Ottawa (approved license)
Gatineau + Montreal (explicit approval provided)
@James, do we have documentation as to where approval was given? Would
be good to have this info on the wiki.
Matthew Darwin
matt...@mdarwin.ca
http://www.mdarwin.ca
On 2018-01-28 05:59 PM, James wrote:
LWG blog post about CC-BY
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
as long as you have explicit permission to add data from city. It
become compatible.
I used "may" as in "should remain on the list because explicit
permission was already obtained."
On Jan 28, 2018 5:53 PM, "OSM Volunteer stevea"
<stevea...@softworkers.com <mailto:stevea...@softworkers.com>> wrote:
On Jan 28, 2018, at 2:39 PM, James <james2...@gmail.com
<mailto:james2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> CC Attribution is compatible with explicit permission, so
Gatineau and Montreal may remain on the list.....
Oh, how I sometimes dislike the word "may!"
I know, I know, our good talk-ca dialog intends to help wider
understanding and consensus. This can be challenging, lengthy,
repeat-oriented / loquacious and seem like it runs in circles!
It gets better.
James, I hereby ask you to change status from red to green once
you know. Perhaps also undo the strikeout type (delete the
<del> brackets in the markup language) in Contributors for those
two cities, too (updating the one or two lines of text it takes
to do that). That goes for anybody posting here and/or reading
this.
To all, wiki what you know, please! Though, sometimes,
conversations here, or in email, or "in the map" or... are more
appropriate.
I'm saying "wiki when wiki is right."
SteveA
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
