https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Usually involves creating a wiki page like

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ottawa/Import/Plan

outlining that licensing isnt an issue and what tags would be
used(addr:housenumber and addr:street for address points) as well as
contigency for conflating against existing data

On Tue., Jul. 7, 2020, 5:11 p.m. Jason Carlson, <ja...@starlandcounty.com>
wrote:

> Okay, I'll scrap the idea of importing roads - mostly because they are
> already there - just off skew but a dozen or more meters in many places. I
> wrote software to fix most of our issues in our area - maybe there is an
> API to do the same with OSM and I can volunteer some skills there.
>
> As a side note, what about point data. I have a bunch of rural addresses
> that I could upload as point data and it would be a lot easier to do the
> initial import at least if I can get a hold of those guidelines so I can
> set it up right the first time :) You know where I can find those?
>
>
> *Jason Carlson*
>
> IT/GIS Administrator
>
> *403.772.3793*
>
> *Starland County*
> *Morrin, AB  *
> *(403) 772-3793*
> *www.starlandcounty.com <http://www.starlandcounty.com/>*
>
> *Our organization accepts no liability for the content of this email, or
> for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information
> provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. The
> content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by
> mistake, please inform us by an email reply and then delete the message. It
> is forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of this
> message to anyone. *
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 2:16 PM stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote:
>
>> > Imports are quite the pain to try and do - there's a whole process in
>> place now to do them. It stems from the experience in the States of an
>> import more than a decade ago of the TIGER data (from the Census Bureau)
>> that is still being fixed after pretty large amounts of time working
>> through it.
>>
>> Major components of the USA's TIGER import included both road (highway=*)
>> and rail (railway=*).  This took place in 2007-8 with early-to-mid-2000s
>> data and resulted in OSM data which were (and still are in places) quite
>> problematic.  There have been many strategies and even renderers which aim
>> to address helping fix the massive amount of TIGER data that were imported,
>> yet it will likely take another decade (three?) to complete these
>> improvements — that's a lot of work.  This sort of "ongoing work to improve
>> an import" is common with earlier / older imports (especially when OSM had
>> little to no "official" guidelines to doing imports well).  Our Import
>> Guidelines go a long way towards remedying common problems associated with
>> imports from "lessons learned" in earlier ones, but imports are still both
>> controversial and often problematic.  However, there are excellent examples
>> of well done imports, usually with very carefully written Import
>> Guidelines, a good deal of community buy-in and consensus and often the
>> guidance of OSM volunteers who have experience with imports and can steer
>> the process in better directions if they begin to go awry.  I don't need to
>> say it, but Kevin is correct:  let TIGER be a lesson to OSM about imports,
>> especially those done at very wide (national) scales in large geographic
>> areas like Canada or USA.  They are challenging to do well, but shouldn't
>> be completely prohibited, but rather done quite carefully and slowly.
>>
>> SteveA
>> California
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to