I'd go for fixme:name=OSSV has xyz
or (if you really think OSSV is superior) fixme:name=was xyz but I've assumed OSSV is correct pending survey Richard On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Ian Spencer <ianmspen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tom Evans wrote on 14/07/2010 09:19: >> >> >> As another suggestion: Is there a special tag we can add to force it to >> highlight on the noname check without actually destroying the name tag? >> >> Tom >> >> > Perhaps what is required is a new hierarchy, like: > > query > > so you might then have query:tag_name > > Not sure how tags work with multiple instances, but I guess you might have: > > query:name;surface > > and perhaps sometimes you might want > > query:path or query:route where you are not happy that the map properly > reflects what is on the ground. > > Spenny > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
