On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
> As I think AndyA pointed out you are not normally looking at a tag out of
> context, e.g. on its own without any of the other tags applying to the same
> feature.
The problem is that the context isn't clear since there is no designated
"context" tag - i.e. if you have a way tagged with highway=climbing and
rock=limestone, is the context provided by the highway tag or the rock
tag?
> Standards wanking aside there is I believe some benefit in evaluating the
> way tags are delivered in xml output so that some hierarchical information
> can be relayed. At present there is no logic to the xml delivery of tags and
> perhaps users of the xml data might benefit if there were.
Presenting hiararchical data in the XML is going to require some kind of
adjustment to how things are tagged in the database (whether this is
simple foo:bar:baz namespaces, or some rather deeper change to the
underlying structure of the data).
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/
Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
