Andy Robinson (blackadder) schrieb: > For a climbing route it's normally the distance of assent that is of > interest is it not and I guess for most traditional climbing routes this is > known? Much easier to state the length of the route than the top and bottom > elevations? Accepted that you might want to converge on an elevation for the > start of the route as accuracy of the position is improved with time.
This reminds me of the recent discussion on canal locks. There the level-difference is also far more important than the absolute elevation. Unfortunately I couldn't find it on the Wiki but if Gerv chose a generic tag it could be reused for this purpose as well. regards, Sven _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
