This is a major concern of mine, which is why I won't even bother asking for local government data at the moment even though it is being offered. Some one else can do the asking and explaining about the "flexible licensing" we seem to be asking for because I don't want the responsibility of asking for something so open ended. The data I have added from a GPS or my own notes is quite different, I don't really care what license is put on it.
> > If we cant even convince a mapping group like NearMap of that licence > certainty, what chance do we have of convincing governments? This means > youre asking data sources to licence their data under an unknown > licence, and to just hope and trust that OSM wont change in the future > (its not disputed that it WILL change in the future). > Cheerio John _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
