I agree wholeheartedly with Mike's points about the current branding around the project. However, as there has been generally positive feedback for the design of this attribution mark, would it make sense to move forward with using the attribution mark (since it addresses an immediate problem) and use that as a jumping off point for rebranding OSM? Rebranding is no small task, and it seems like it would be a shame to hold off on going ahead with what (I'm hearing) most folks think is a good initiative so that we can complete a rebranding initiative first.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier <j...@liotier.org> wrote: > On 24/04/2013 16:03, Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> Are you therefore saying that what has been designed as an attribution >> mark should be our new logo, or are you saying that there does not have to >> be a likeness between the logo and the attribution mark? >> > > Let me add the following alternative : there has to be a likeness between > the logo and the attribution mark, in order to maintain the visual > consistency of the brand - whatever the chosen design. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk> >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
