Kathleen Danielson wrote: > However, as there has been generally positive feedback for the > design of this attribution mark, would it make sense to move > forward with using the attribution mark (since it addresses an > immediate problem)
Definitely. The perfect is the enemy of the good, and all that. If you wait for 100% consensus on talk@ you'll never get anything done. And, as ever, stuff can be fine-tuned after initial deployment. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/RFC-updated-OSM-Attribution-Mark-was-contributor-mark-tp5758043p5758370.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
