Both the new mark and the copyright page look very slick. Clean, friendly, inviting. Great work!
-- Marc Regan Cofounder, Mapkin (http://mapkin.co) On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Kathleen Danielson wrote: > > However, as there has been generally positive feedback for the > > design of this attribution mark, would it make sense to move > > forward with using the attribution mark (since it addresses an > > immediate problem) > > > > > Definitely. The perfect is the enemy of the good, and all that. If you wait > for 100% consensus on talk@ you'll never get anything done. And, as ever, > stuff can be fine-tuned after initial deployment. > > cheers > Richard > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/RFC-updated-OSM-Attribution-Mark-was-contributor-mark-tp5758043p5758370.html > Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com > (http://Nabble.com). > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org (mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org) > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk