Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my mind this is a good move and should be supported. Point 3 above could > be resolved by running the script regularly to see if there are any new > matches. There have also been some good suggestions on this list such as a > KeepRight style (i.e. QA) map where problematic objects (e.g. script finds > more than one match) can be manually reviewed, confirming whether the > script conflicts with any existing wikidata tags in OSM, checking whether > the script would add a wikidata tag to an object when there is already a > different object in OSM with that wikidata tag, and a check on the 400m > distance rule [2]. > > Are these things possible Edward?
I can certainly make a list of cases where there are multiple OSM objects matching a single Wikidata item. Building the interface for viewing and fixing them might be more tricky, it is probably not something I can build right now. I've written the code to look for conflicts. You can see the results here: http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/mismatches.html I've been thinking about my choice of 400m for the matching. I'm going to change the matching criteria to include a distance field, then set a low distance (200m) for things like restaurants, and a much higher distance (50km) for bigger areas, like national parks. Thanks for the summary Rob, it is really helpful. -- Edward. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
