Just a comment on Fredrick's input. Selecting the sample is one of the most difficult parts of a survey to get right.  The self selection part of this survey makes it open to bias, as Frederick has commented this is compounded by the platform. I'm not making a comment about if the platform is appropriate or not just that if it affects your response then it begins to cast doubt on your results.

The second is knowing enough about your target audience so they will understand your questions.  Perhaps have someone non technical with an English Language background, a librarian, for example check it for jargon.   One technique is to run a trial survey against a true random sample.  I don't think this was done here.

If they don't understand what you're asking then you aren't going to get a reliable answers and to be honest I didn't.

I'm not sure if this particular survey is trying to justify a particular stance or get accurate information.

Cheerio John

Frederik Ramm wrote on 4/30/2023 11:18 AM:
Hi,

On 4/28/23 15:57, Marc_marc wrote:
I am impressed (and disappointed) that those who do these surveys
have still not learned that part of the active opendata community
does not wish to ally a closeddata based enterprise (nominally:
no use of google forms for some of us).

Agree. It's one thing for an OSMF working group to use a closed source/siloed product internally, but quite another to attempt to engage with the community via such a product.

I am not surprised when a commercial company like Tom Tom does that without a second thought, but I would expect more from an OSMF working group.

Please find a way for non-Google users to participate in this survey, or your results will be biased to the point of un-suitability because they will lack responses from people who'd rather not engage with Google, i.e. the whole "communication behaviours" of this group of people would not be represented.

Bye
Frederik


--
Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to