-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Syafril,
On 04 September 2001 at 23:14:24 +0700 (which was 17:14 where I live)
Syafril Hermansyah wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these
points:
SH> What do you think if others members replied your posting and on
SH> the TO: address ""Syafril Hermansyah on
SH> TBUDL"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
Why would they do that? Surely, that's their problem not ours.
SH> If then you replied it again, your greetings will look funy :-)
Maybe, but there's always the "by hand" fix for when the automation
goes wrong - one that the the original incorrect reply should have
been employing.
The real point being made here is that when it goes *right* (which is
*all* of the time on most lists I've seen) it makes for a much richer
and more human dialog and threading format.
The "Real name" part of an address is meant to make the message
address more humanly readable. Why not use it for that purpose?
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\ BrainStorm - free thinking - www: http://www.brainstormsw.com /
\ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com /
SB! v1.53n/iKey1000- 55238-48F0B on Windows NT 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: GPG Sealed for freshness
iD8DBQE7lQRqOeQkq5KdzaARAjeHAKDpT/jOmlsMcnDiVpIhpDckFOTnlgCg+TXK
kJmJn0RoQhkxqbWYZG5j8Is=
=EUO6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
________________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
