-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, January 17, 2003, Miguel A. Urech wrote...
>> Agent's threading is also superior, IMO. > In the 17 groups I monitor (with TB) I have never seen an > un-properly threaded message. Having looked at the RFCs for NNTP, the threading is done in an identical fashion I believe, even using the same header names, In-Reply-To and References. Those are the same headers that TB! uses to do normal mail threading, and so the threading will work over there too. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPihaLSuD6BT4/R9zEQIaTACfST91NxNkpK8gF5YQYMCnjTKMumkAoO+v Ci6gfN1wP9yJGyEEuDY/tSRI =rQCo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
