On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On 8/2/10 21:25 , Derek J. Balling wrote: >> Yes it means twice as much SNMP traffic for a bunch of metrics that are in >> the join-set of "trend" and "monitor/alert", but it's well worth it, in my >> opinion. > > Caching proxy?
Is there even such a thing for SNMP? Not sure I'd want it, though. Partly because the cache timeouts would have to be insanely low anyway (on the order of a minute or two), and partly because I wouldn't a piece of cached-data to delay a nagios-alert being triggered. Cheers, D _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
