On Sep 4, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Andrew Hume wrote:

> is bridge the right term? and can anyone specifically
> recommend a brand or disrecommend a brand?
> i am contemplating a linksys wrt54gl

Most APs can also operate in bridge mode, but if you want to use them to 
wirelessly extend a Wifi network and then bridge that to ethernet, the wireless 
network extension method has to be supported by both the core AP and the 
extension AP, and they need to use the same technologies to do so.

The WDS methodology has gotten commonplace enough that most manufacturers who 
claim to support WDS should interoperate with most other manufacturers that 
also claim to support WDS, but of course there could always be minor niggling 
details.  For that reason, when setting up an extension of a wireless network, 
I try to always use gear from the same vendor and which is explicitly 
referenced as being compatible with each other.

I personally like Apple Airport Extremes for this kind of operation, or perhaps 
an Airport Extreme for the core AP and then an Airport Express as the WDS 
extension.  But Netgear or D-Link should probably also work, although I'd be 
inclined to go with the more recent versions of their equipment.


If you're extending a mixed 802.11a/b/g/n network, then what I like to do is to 
set up separate 2GHz (802.11b/g) and 5Ghz (802.11a/n) networks with different 
but related names, and then extend only the 5Ghz network.  When I do that, the 
2Ghz network comes along for the ride for free, whereas if I try to extend the 
2Ghz network then things get seriously weird and don't work well -- and the 
5Ghz network gets totally screwed.

With the new simultaneous dual-frequency equipment, it doesn't seem that you 
can turn off one or the other network frequencies, which is supposed to make 
things easier when you've only got the one AP all by itself.  However, in my 
experience this tends to make things more complex and less reliable when you 
have to try to extend the network wirelessly.


Of course, you could always run a WRT54GL with the appropriate after-market 
firmware installed on them, but that's been a pain to support, and the hardware 
is getting old and can't handle the newer frequencies and isn't so good at 
handling the newer protocols.

--
Brad Knowles <b...@shub-internet.org>
LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu>


_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to