> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote: > > I'm not going to comment on the mail itself, but I've seen a lot of > incredibly > > dubious articles on the net over the last few days. > > > > - use your brains, people. Just because a guy does say so doesn't mean > there's > > a backdoor. B Ever heard about FUD ? > > > > - of course OpenBSD is going to check. Geeez!! what do you think ? > > I'm really sorry to pitch in here, but... > > The centerpiece of this thread, besides technical details of how/whether to > prove/disprove the so-called accusations, seems to be an argument on > whether Perry's purely FUD'ing, promoting his company/pages, creating > the buzz, or whether his words should be taken for their face value.
As for promoting his company, someone yesterday showed me this: http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/ficidet.exe?action=DETREG&docnum=G09000158184&rdocnum=G09000158184 Look at the line marked Status. > I have to say that Perry here is credited with one thing he actually did not > do -- publish this to the world. There has been talk of alterior motives here, > but for any of these motives, Perry had to know or pretty damn well guessed > that the second thing Theo (hi, Theo) would do to his email was to publish > it. > Would you plan anything based on a predicted behavior of a person you > haven't communicated with in 10 years? > > This is not to point finger at Theo for creating all this commotion, of > course; > this commotion can, however, be, an unintended accident, but the fact that > it came from Theo gave it a lot of credibility. Whoa, wait a second here. If you think I gave it credibility, you need to go back and read my words again. I called it an allegation, and I stick with that. I was extremely careful with my words, and you are wrong to interpret them as you do.
