Zdenek Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 29 May 2006, [iso-8859-1] Frank Küster wrote: > >> Furthermore, I think the best thing we got from Thomas is the >> infrastructure, which has been merged into TeXlive and is still >> maintained by him there. Work on selecting and updating CTAN >> packages, and in creating useful collections, is probably better >> done within TeXlive, or by making the MikTeX installer work with a >> preinstalled TeX system. >> > I agree. Having rpm's is good just for a group of Redhat based > systems.
Yes and no. The most important thing would probably have a _file list_, or package list. Whether one generates RPMs or DEBs or whatever else from such a list would then be a secondary consideration. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum