On Jan 30, 11:13 am, hpon <peter.norli...@gmail.com> wrote: > In what sense is the core too big? It simply is file size.
> I think that mathematical notation should be regarded as an elimentary > feature, since the purpose of TW (in my view) is to present and manage > information in an effective way. That purpose cannot be generally > fullfilled without a proper support for math notation. Plus, society > as we know it would collaps if people don't communicate and reson in > mathematical terms. Your are right. This conversation wouldn't be possible without mathematics. > I cannot see why intrensic math support would be a problem for any > user. ... hmm, If I don't need it, why should I carry it around ;) > ... Perhaps you could expand a little on why embracing math > notation functionality would be harmful. It would not be harmful at all. It's not the notation, it's the implementation. Let's say one is using jsMath for a long time allready. One would want to have it included into the core. Others may prefer MathJax. I personally would like to see mathquill [1] included .... For me the plugin solution wins. Everyone gets what s/he wants. ==== There has been a post lately about LaTeX support [2]. May be the links I posted, contain some hints, to get the plugins working. -m [1] https://github.com/laughinghan/mathquill [2] http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/browse_thread/thread/61d33032dd0f21d2/15692cbab495b37d -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
