Stephen, How did you find those missing tiddlers under the missing tab? In the Emptly.HTML there are no missing tiddlers but 'TiddlyWiki' is linked too and does not exist. And I think that TiddlyWiki should be defined in an empty TiddlyWiki especially if we decide to change the name from, empty.html to TiddlyWiki.html or some variation of TW for the name. As I have said before I like the biggest name I can get and I know I am in the minority, this would be my choice for naming structure TiddlyWiki-5-1-6-empty.html.
I agree that having missing tiddlers should be minimized / eliminated. Can we help with that Jeremy? If so how? Rich Shumaker On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:07:24 AM UTC-8, Stephen Kimmel wrote: > > I'm keen to get 5.1.6 out soon, so all this help is much appreciated, >> > > This isn't really related to the topic but it is something I thought was > worth mentioning when you go back to work on 5.1.6... By my count there are > 171 "Missing" tiddlers. Some, I suspect, were never intended to be > tiddlers. I think the missing tiddler list should be minimal. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
