Brady,

Not only do I believe you can achieve this with TiddlyWiki, you can go a 
lot further. The same data can be organised multiple ways. Using title, 
tags and content search will get you a long way but do not under estimate 
the use of fields as well. Once a field exists it can be searched for its 
existence with has:field[fieldname] even before you questions the fields 
content. Then fields can be used like tags with one or multiple values in a 
list in each field.

One of the keys is ensuring a tiddler is classified on creation or update. 
A number of things can be done to encourage this.

Jeds GenTags plugin https://ooktech.com/jed/ExampleWikis/GenericTagFields/ 
permits the building of Tag equivalent sets, which I plan to use for 
categories and subjects and other organising keywords.

Tag are great because we can apply any tag to any thing however as 
complexity builds they become overwhelming. 

To deal with this I initially used filters and lists that could list tags 
that are tagged by another tag, I also used versions of the TableOfContents 
that expose multiple hierarchies of tags starting with alternate master 
tags.

However in my more sophisticated wikis I plan to build independent subject, 
category and keyword fields which have a curated set of "values" so when 
entering content you are prompted to nominate one of more values for each 
field, from a curated set of values. This will help prompt the application 
of appropriate organising values.

For Example
Tags - adhoc or parent child relationships
Category - One or more categories from a category list/hierarchy 
Strict Category - One only categorie from a category list/hierarchy 
Subject -  One or more subjects from a subject list/hierarchy 
Strict Subject -  One only subject from a subject list/hierarchy 
Keywords - any number of words, not in the text that may provide an avenue 
to find the tiddler again

After using the above methods you can also design searches that operate 
across all values.

Regards
Tony

On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 12:16:26 AM UTC+10, Brady77 wrote:
>
> Dear members,
>
> you may have the same problem: the only way I can remember things is by 
> having some *context*. How such a context is created depends on how 
> people actually think. You may recall a person via a place where you met 
> before. Or a time frame combined with a place. And emotions, maybe. 
> Probably the most popular scheme for creating a context is 
> *classification*. People tend to create "boxes" for things because they 
> need some context (of course, to be able to rule those things later, but it 
> is a different story). What are we forced to use in the IT world are 
> *folders* and *tags*. Folders allow for creating a *hierarchy*, but don't 
> allow to have a thing (a tiddler) to be in more than one folder at the same 
> time - *just one context only*. Tags on the other hand are *flat* in 
> structure, but allow for *more than one context*. Tiddlywiki allows for a 
> combination: *tags hierarchy*. Great! So I developed a system of tags 
> that helps me recall things quickly. Just to show you what I mean by a 
> "system of tags":
>
> 1. Data format
>
> 1.1 Image
>
> 1.2 Webpage
>
> 1.3 Video
>
> 1.4  ...
>
> 2. Message form
>
> 2.1 Report
>
> 2.2 Tutorial
>
> 2.3 Overview
>
> 2.4 Promo
>
> 3. Topic
>
> 3.1 Business
>
>  3.1.1 Marketing
>
> 3.1.1.1 Content marketing
>
> 3.1.1.2 SEO
>
> 3.1.2 Trading
>
> 3.1.2.1 Stock
>
> 3.1.2.2 Cryptocurrency 
>
> 3.2 Art
>
> 3.2.1 Visual
>
> 3.2.1.1 Typography
>
> 3.2.1.2 Photography
>
> 3.2.1.3 Drawing
>
> 3.2.1.4 Architecture
>
> 3.2.2 Performing
>
> 3.2.2.1 Music
>
> 3.2.2.2 Movie 
>
> 4. Subject
>
> 4.1 TiddlyWiki
>
> 4.2 Cisco
>
> 4.3 Donald Trump
>
> 4.4 ...    
>
>
> What I created is a kind of faceted classification 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faceted_classification>. Let me describe 
> my ideal workflow, now:
>
> Say I came across an interesting post on Medium: *How to write something 
> that people like to read. * I decided to save it into my TiddlyWiki. With 
> Tiddlyclip I created new tiddler and added some tags, too: ["Webpage", 
> "Tutorial", "Content marketing","Typography"].  
>
> A few weeks later I am writing a blog post to support my business, but I 
> don't know how to write an interesting copy. Is there anything interesting 
> in my TiddlyWiki? Let's have a look: First I would type "marketing" into 
> the *search bar*. Next I want to narrow the fulltext search output to 
> categories, so I choose "*show me tags only"*. By clicking on a 
> "Marketing" keyword it will be added to the *search filter*. Now I have a 
> *list 
> of filtered tiddlers* from the Marketing *category *and all 
> *subcategories*. Beside the list of tiddlers there is a *list of related 
> tags.* What if I want to narrow my search again? I just click on 
> "Tutorial" (from the related tags list) to add the tag to the filter. There 
> are now two tags with a logical AND operator. If my list of tiddlers is 
> still too long, I may narrow it again by choosing "Content marketing". 
> Voila, my article is there! ;)
>
> Do you think it is feasible to create something like this? Something what 
> Amazon has on his pages - a faceted search. Sorry for my complicated 
> description.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b22dbef4-b949-45fe-b71e-027d30848e58%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to