Post Script I should also of added, custom fields for with particular values For example
- source for a URL to where you found the info - file-location where supporting material is stored - etc... Regards Tony On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 8:32:07 AM UTC+10, TonyM wrote: > > Brady, > > Not only do I believe you can achieve this with TiddlyWiki, you can go a > lot further. The same data can be organised multiple ways. Using title, > tags and content search will get you a long way but do not under estimate > the use of fields as well. Once a field exists it can be searched for its > existence with has:field[fieldname] even before you questions the fields > content. Then fields can be used like tags with one or multiple values in a > list in each field. > > One of the keys is ensuring a tiddler is classified on creation or update. > A number of things can be done to encourage this. > > Jeds GenTags plugin https://ooktech.com/jed/ExampleWikis/GenericTagFields/ > permits the building of Tag equivalent sets, which I plan to use for > categories and subjects and other organising keywords. > > Tag are great because we can apply any tag to any thing however as > complexity builds they become overwhelming. > > To deal with this I initially used filters and lists that could list tags > that are tagged by another tag, I also used versions of the TableOfContents > that expose multiple hierarchies of tags starting with alternate master > tags. > > However in my more sophisticated wikis I plan to build independent > subject, category and keyword fields which have a curated set of "values" > so when entering content you are prompted to nominate one of more values > for each field, from a curated set of values. This will help prompt the > application of appropriate organising values. > > For Example > Tags - adhoc or parent child relationships > Category - One or more categories from a category list/hierarchy > Strict Category - One only categorie from a category list/hierarchy > Subject - One or more subjects from a subject list/hierarchy > Strict Subject - One only subject from a subject list/hierarchy > Keywords - any number of words, not in the text that may provide an avenue > to find the tiddler again > > After using the above methods you can also design searches that operate > across all values. > > Regards > Tony > > On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 12:16:26 AM UTC+10, Brady77 wrote: >> >> Dear members, >> >> you may have the same problem: the only way I can remember things is by >> having some *context*. How such a context is created depends on how >> people actually think. You may recall a person via a place where you met >> before. Or a time frame combined with a place. And emotions, maybe. >> Probably the most popular scheme for creating a context is >> *classification*. People tend to create "boxes" for things because they >> need some context (of course, to be able to rule those things later, but it >> is a different story). What are we forced to use in the IT world are >> *folders* and *tags*. Folders allow for creating a *hierarchy*, but >> don't allow to have a thing (a tiddler) to be in more than one folder at >> the same time - *just one context only*. Tags on the other hand are >> *flat* in structure, but allow for *more than one context*. Tiddlywiki >> allows for a combination: *tags hierarchy*. Great! So I developed a >> system of tags that helps me recall things quickly. Just to show you what I >> mean by a "system of tags": >> >> 1. Data format >> >> 1.1 Image >> >> 1.2 Webpage >> >> 1.3 Video >> >> 1.4 ... >> >> 2. Message form >> >> 2.1 Report >> >> 2.2 Tutorial >> >> 2.3 Overview >> >> 2.4 Promo >> >> 3. Topic >> >> 3.1 Business >> >> 3.1.1 Marketing >> >> 3.1.1.1 Content marketing >> >> 3.1.1.2 SEO >> >> 3.1.2 Trading >> >> 3.1.2.1 Stock >> >> 3.1.2.2 Cryptocurrency >> >> 3.2 Art >> >> 3.2.1 Visual >> >> 3.2.1.1 Typography >> >> 3.2.1.2 Photography >> >> 3.2.1.3 Drawing >> >> 3.2.1.4 Architecture >> >> 3.2.2 Performing >> >> 3.2.2.1 Music >> >> 3.2.2.2 Movie >> >> 4. Subject >> >> 4.1 TiddlyWiki >> >> 4.2 Cisco >> >> 4.3 Donald Trump >> >> 4.4 ... >> >> >> What I created is a kind of faceted classification >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faceted_classification>. Let me describe >> my ideal workflow, now: >> >> Say I came across an interesting post on Medium: *How to write something >> that people like to read. * I decided to save it into my TiddlyWiki. >> With Tiddlyclip I created new tiddler and added some tags, too: ["Webpage", >> "Tutorial", "Content marketing","Typography"]. >> >> A few weeks later I am writing a blog post to support my business, but I >> don't know how to write an interesting copy. Is there anything interesting >> in my TiddlyWiki? Let's have a look: First I would type "marketing" into >> the *search bar*. Next I want to narrow the fulltext search output to >> categories, so I choose "*show me tags only"*. By clicking on a >> "Marketing" keyword it will be added to the *search filter*. Now I have >> a *list of filtered tiddlers* from the Marketing *category *and all >> *subcategories*. Beside the list of tiddlers there is a *list of related >> tags.* What if I want to narrow my search again? I just click on >> "Tutorial" (from the related tags list) to add the tag to the filter. There >> are now two tags with a logical AND operator. If my list of tiddlers is >> still too long, I may narrow it again by choosing "Content marketing". >> Voila, my article is there! ;) >> >> Do you think it is feasible to create something like this? Something what >> Amazon has on his pages - a faceted search. Sorry for my complicated >> description. >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/55e3a731-e7c7-41a7-9a0c-41684a7be9b1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
