Re DavidEpstein's sceptical post citing the Keele University Press release
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130403071957.htm
andsubsequent posts:
 
I emailedRobin Hadley, who undertook the reported research, asking for 
information abouthis methodology, how the subjects were recruited, and 
specifically whether theywere self-selected. The relevant part of his response 
is as follows:
 
"In order to examine the issues surrounding the desire forparenthood a 
sequential mixed-methods quantitative-qualitative approach wasselected. This 
approach allows the verification of results, generation of newareas of 
interest, and provides generalisabilty of results. An on-linequestionnaire was 
designed to measure the influences, motivations, and reasonsthat may affect the 
decision to parent. Included was a unique item attemptingto measure the 
reactions associated with broodiness. Open questions wereintegrated into the 
survey to provide detail of the respondent’s lifeexperience and, in addition, 
aid validity by providing feedback on the survey.Respondents were recruited by 
a snowball technique and over two hundredcompleted replies (n=232) were 
analysed using descriptive, univariate,and bivarite techniques. The profile of 
the sample data gave a mode of femalewith the majority of respondents being 
White-British, degree educated,professional, and heterosexual."
 
Not being a statistician, I could make little sense of this. (Anytranslations 
of significant sentences will be welcomed!) In response I askedHadley what a 
"snowball technique" is. In his reply he wrote that itis "verypopular in 
qualitative [sic] research as a strategy for accessing hard to 
reachpopulations", and may be defined as: "The recruitment method thatasks a 
participant to pass details of the study to his/her interpersonalnetwork to 
generate further recruits."
 
Inreply I wrote that it seems evident that the subjects were self-selected, 
andthat that reduces the reliability of the results of the survey. I 
alsosuggested this should have been made clear in the press release.
 
Inhis response Hadley ignored my point about self-selected subjects, and 
merelythanked me for my interest (!) while directing my question about the 
pressrelease to the British Sociological Society person responsible for it.
 
AsDavid's link to the following article shows, Hadley is hardly a disinterested 
researcheron this issue: 
"I’m 53 now and I’m not a father. Inever will be. I am happily married – to my 
second wife – and we have nochildren. It’s not that we didn’t want any; since 
my mid-thirties, I have beenbroody, desperate for the kids that I watched my 
friends and colleagues havingover the years."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/fatherhood/9969542/Robin-Hadley-I-know-all-about-broody-men-who-long-to-be-dads.-I-am-one.html
 
So we have here another (and possibly the worst) in a recent tendency towards 
premature pressreleases from universities in the UK and the US publicising 
unreplicatedstudies without peer-review having, it would seem, as its main 
purpose thepromotion of the name of the university. 

Allen Esterson
Former lecturer, Science Department
Southwark College, London
allenester...@compuserve.com
http://www.esterson.org
 
--------------------------------------
 
  
  
From:
  
  
  
David Epstein <da...@neverdave.com>
  
 
 
  
  
Subject:
  
  
  
"Childlessness hits men the hardest" (n = 16)
  
 
 
  
  
Date:
  
  
  
Thu, 4 Apr 2013 02:02:36 -0400 (EDT)
  
 

 
Spotted on Google News: a university press release getting picked up
as if it were science news. It's a survey with differences such as "8
out of 16 men" (50%) versus "14 out of 51 women" (27%).
<http://www.google.com/news?&q=%22robin+hadley%22&hl=en>
 
Well, you can chi-square the numbers yourself
<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130403071957.htm>.
There is NOT EVEN ONE DIFFERENCE between men and women in the survey.
 --David Epstein
  da...@neverdave.com

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=24846
or send a blank email to 
leave-24846-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to