On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:46:57 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sounds like you're not being conservative--Izzy gonna get you :)
 
also--you're choosing to ignore Brooks' point, simply proving he's correct by re-applying the cultural argument from contingency which (in Brooks' opinion) is at the root of this area of cultural chaos:
 
Judy:
>What Ruth did was a choice rather than a 'covenant'
 
jt: Ruth's choice was not a chancy thing nor was it contingent upon the culture they lived in.
She was sensitive to Naomi's God and left paganism to stay part of this family and by so
doing is named in the lineage of Christ.
 
I've been through the chastisement of Izzy already Gary :) 
 
Judy
 
 


Reply via email to