Do you realize who David Brooks is? Ask your husband (the one you choose not to covenant with:) Actually, if you (two)  prove the 'distortion' [sic], below, you could sully Brooks' substantial conservative, editiorial credibility at the _New York Times_ (and PBS) which liberals like Paul Krugman and Mark Shields've been tryin' to do for years. Have at it:)

gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com
 
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:14:04 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so, what is his point?
 
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:06:16 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brooks distorts scripture to try and use it to make his point ..
so yes, that did get lost.
 
 
true--the sense of the scripture in Brooks' article
 
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:44:56 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something got lost
 

gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com
 

gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com

Reply via email to