let me rephrase this,j <lol>
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
 
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:14:04 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so, what is his [new, subjective,'jandg..'] point [augmented by your redaction of the Ruth/Naomi story]?
 
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:06:16 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brooks distorts scripture to try and use it to make his point ..
so yes, that did get lost.
 
 
true--the sense of the scripture in Brooks' article
 
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:44:56 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something got lost

Reply via email to