yesirrreeebob
Eh? Got relatives in Canada
eh?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: November 24, 2005 12:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
corrector/revisor
(hey DaveH--a
new TT record for concatenating responses, eh?
:)
"Bill is
[sanctified]," is presumed, and, at best, [though eternal], (is) now;
therefore, the [sanctified-ness] is transitory [for now] which also
squares with human experience; therefore, the present
tense '[sanctified-]ness' is incomplete
"Bill is
[sad]," is presumed, and, at best, (is) now; therefore, the [sadness] is
transitory which also squares with human experience; therefore, the
present tense '[sad]ness' is incomplete
myth
("Bill is happy," is presumed, and, at best, (is) now; therefore, the
happiness is transitory which also squares with human experience;
therefore, the present tense 'happiness' is
incomplete)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:02:32 -0500 "David
Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: || > Present tense does not
necessarily indicate incomplete action. > "Bill is
happy," this does not mean that Bill is incomplete in his >
happiness. ||
|