* Bertrand Chenal [2012-05-07 22:16 +0200]:
Le Mon, 7 May 2012 21:08:45 +0200,
Cédric Krier <[email protected]> a écrit :

I already see the answer from Cédric ("But you should check when we do
the codereview") : It doesn't work, it's already too difficult to read
all the reviews and think about the code. Moreover when reading code
bit by bit it's impossible to find inconsistencies across files/modules.

So IMO we should have two round of translation, a first one to do most
of the translations, spot the problems and talk about it together. And
a second one after the code freeze to finalize the work.

I think that translation should be considered just like development.
And thus only bugfixes for the translation should enter the main
branch during the freeze.

But then what we need is translation teams that are proactive rather
then idle during 6 months and wake up suddenly because the release is
coming.

If transiflex is the way to promote this kind of behavior then so be
it.

--
Nicolas Évrard

B2CK SPRL
rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
E-mail/Jabber: [email protected]
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to