No, this whole thing has got well beyond tedious now, if you haven't got the point yet that Rocket spend money on U2UG rather than give money to it - and that the board want is this way - you never will.
On 21/03/2011 22:10, "fft2...@aol.com" <fft2...@aol.com> wrote: > Then George correct my "factual incorrectness" by telling us what money Rocket > is providing for U2UG ? > You're saying that my claim that they aren't providing any is factually > incorrect. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: George Land <george.l...@aptsolutions.co.uk> > To: U2 Users List <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> > Cc: u2-users <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> > Sent: Sun, Mar 20, 2011 11:21 pm > Subject: Re: [U2] U2UG Elections 2010 - Request For Comment > >> > > The problem with that point of view is that you don't know what Rocket wants > from U2UG nor do you know what backing they give already. As I have said, and > Brian Leach has confirmed, the board has no problem with the support we get > from > Rocket. Continuing to maintain that Rocket wants something but is unwilling > to > provide any money is just factually incorrect. > > _______________________________________________ > > U2-Users mailing list > > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
