> Feel free to correct my understanding but I think you're pushing at a > different door. Ubuntuvideo.com doesn't host videos; it streams them > and is a site which I think can be used to front the project: i.e. to > promote videos, allow users to vote on them etc.
Definately. I think we need to weigh our options carefully though. I'd like to know what kind of traffic Ubuntuvideo.com sees versus the kind of traffic that another alternative we've been given is likely to offer up (like a dedicated Ubuntu channel at the video hosting site discussed earlier). > As for hosting, free > hosting is available from youtube and archive.org which I believe Alan > Pope used for screencasts.ubuntu.com, but if better offers for hosting > videos produced by the marketing team come in, then there is no reason > not to consider them. > > As for videos produced by others which are already hosted around the > internet, hosting isn't needed for those, it's just the "viral" part > of the project which then comes into play. Or have I misunderstood? Sure, and that's a great thing too. At the end of the day, if we can host on another website we can embed the videos into sites like Ubuntuvideo.com > -- > Matthew East Cheers Chris -- ubuntu-marketing mailing list ubuntu-marketing@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
