> From: Chris Wendt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Replying in the charset of the original message is in my view > reasonable > behavior: the recipient of your reply has the best chance to read the > message in the encoding the original message was sent. Changing the > encoding decreases the chance the replyee will be able to read your > message. For person-to-person emails, this makes sense. It does not hold up for mailing lists, however - it's not necessarily unreasonable behavior, but the odds of readability for mailing lists are fixed to the character set, regardless of the character set used in any individual mailing (note that the Windows Thai character set could not be viewed by many people - changed to UTF-8, almost everyone could read it). For this reason, I would really like to see option controlled behavior (use the current behavior as a default). /|/|ike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? James Kass
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Jungshik Shin
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Peter_Constable
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Jungshik Shin
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? てんどうりゅうじ
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Peter_Constable
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? James Kass
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Chris Wendt
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? James Kass
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? DougEwell2
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Otto Stolz
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Tex Texin
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? DougEwell2
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? DougEwell2
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? G. Adam Stanislav
- RE: Is there Unicode mail out there? Ayers, Mike
- Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? Rick McGowan
- FW: Re: Is there Unicode mail out there? てんどうりゅうじ