Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
>Show of hands:
>
>How many people on this list find the existing functionality adequate 
>enough to use, even if it's not ideal?

I think everyone who has found the bibliographic project has started
looking for it out of a strong feeling of the inadequacy of what is
there. Those who don't need it or are happy with it are not here. Do you
need quotes for pushing priorities? ;-)


On a side note, I've started to do my bibliographies in OOo with Bibus
(http://bibus-biblio.sourceforge.net/) which, although a bit rough to
install, can do significantly more than OOo (including author-date
citations) and is I think a "good workaround" for many until
bibliographic has done its work.

Florian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to