whoo now, i don't want to get involved, but i do want to let it be known that since 
this is an open source project, nothing is stopping you from adding the feature you're 
asking for.  
* download the source from cvs
* make the change you're requesting
* submit the change as a patch to JIRA.
* hope that a commiter will take the patch and apply it to the codebase!  =)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 3:41 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
> 
> 
> 
> Michal Maczka wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 18:00, Brill Pappin wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>I thought I had explained this?
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >You did not.
> >
> >[...]
> >  
> >
> 
> Actually yes I did, working backwards in time and no 
> including the one 
> quoted here:
> 
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:53:47 -0400:
> "The reason I specifically want to do it, is so I can use the 
> manifest 
> to package extended information about the classes. I think I 
> said that 
> though..."
> 
> At Monday, June 28, 2004 2:21 PM
> "Doing this allows me to use the manifest versioning, labeling and 
> dependency parts of the manifest."
> 
> I think there might even be a few others I missed.
> 
> >>If you want to know more about what I'm doing (and why I'm 
> asking for 
> >>this), you can get a very good idea at this site:
> >>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/versioning/index.html
> >>
> >>Specifically take a look at the "Package Versioning 
> Specification" which 
> >>is link to the URL above, or at this URL:
> >>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/versioning/spec/ve
rsioningTOC.html
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>Are you aware of the fact that servlet specification clearly defines the
>location in the war archive where manifest files should go?
>  
>
[...]

>IMO there is absolutely no difference and servlet spec _recommends_ the
>first option!
>
>So this reason is not really a valid one and there is no any other valid
>reason why this should be done. At least I am not going to do this.
>
>  
>
Have you tried to do it with the war?
Did you even read that spec? Obviously not.
The classloader loads the jar and the respective versioning information 
not the webapp container that loads the war!
Remember that in this day and age all list mail gets archived so what 
you just said above will be preserved forever.

Michal, you are leading me to believe that you are the originator for 
this plugin. If that is the case I am hearing some very  negative 
feedback from a member of this project which boils down to "I'm to lazy 
and can't be bothered".

Not only to lazy to do the work, which would be at your discretion, but 
to lazy to even bother looking into what I'm asking for and giving 
reasonable and coherent reasons for not doing it.

I don't think you *must* add this feature because *I* ask for it, but 
you owe all of us the courtesy of looking into the request (which you 
very clearly have not done).

This is exactly the kind of negative attitude that is turning people off 
of Maven and I find it very disappointing.

- Brill Pappin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to