James wrote: > You forgot to mention the MS orchestrated campain,
More significant is the fact that Mass is on its third CTO in two years. The third one being the one that endorsed OOXML, because of its "technical superiority". (Never mind the fact that not only are there no working implementations of software that adheres to the published specifications, it is impossible for any organizations to create a working implementation based on the published specifications. ) >and the direct interference in the government decision making. I figured somebody else would point out that Microsoft is dominant only because of bribes given to federal and state officials. Now if the US DOJ has any guts at all, the entire board of directors of Microsoft would be sitting in jail, for violation of yet another part of US Criminal Code. xan jonathon -- OOo can not correct for incompetence in creating documents from MSO. Furthermore,OOo can not compensate for the defective and flawed security measures used by Microsoft. As such, before using this product for exams that require faulty and defective software, ensure that you will not be unjustly penalized for the incompetence of the organization that requires the use of software that is known to be flawed, defective, bug-ridden, and fails to meet ISO file format standards. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
