On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:10:20 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt <t...@ipinc.net> wrote:

> There is something to be said for the UNIX philosophy of "small
> is beautiful"  You may love your MIMEdefang but why do I have to
> run it when this problem is so easily fixed?

This (alone) is no reason to run MIMEDefang.  However, if you have
moderately-complex to hairy policy requirements, you may find that
MIMEDefang lets you code them up more maintainably than other
solutions.  In that case, it's a fine idea to use MIMEDefang's
facilities for avoiding scanning authenticated mail.

Regards,

David.

Reply via email to