thoughts? you changed a score and SA did what you told it to.
On 25.09.14 11:06, Deeztek Support wrote:
I changed it as per the suggestion of Matus UHLAR - fantomas
no. I have wondered why you have chnged it to sero, when SA rules have
negative values.
I apparently forgot to note that you should comment out the setting and se
the one from SA rules.
as already suggested by John Hardin, fix URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
"Also: URIBL_BLOCKED - you really want to set up a local recursive
(non-forwarding) DNS server for SA so that your URIBL lookups will work,
that might help a lot. "
I can certainly try that, however seeing that I'm implementing block
lists on the postfix level, wouldn't that double the lookups?
certainly not. you have doubled them when you set up checks in postfix.
SA clearly uses them too, otherwise it would not get the BLOCKED reply.
And as an FYI, I'm running my own DNS server.
your own caching DNS server? does your mail server use it?
You seem to have too much mail then.
(local uribl mirror should be free of charge iirc)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Chernobyl was an Windows 95 beta test site.
