On 12.09.15 15:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
and no, i am not the package maintainer but the first person who would
file a bug for *any* package which rely on a internet connection due
update

Am 14.09.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
in such case it's up to the distributions' maintainer to:
- provide static rules in the (maybe separate) package
- to warn user that he must immediately get new rules or the SA won't work

On 14.09.15 18:40, Reindl Harald wrote:
it is a SA 3.4.1 bug that it don't start when /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/ while the package ships the static rules in /usr/share/spamassassin/

with the original 3.4.0 setup it started just fine before sa-update as i installed all that stuff a year ago

if you would have followed the thread before response you would know that already

I see this particular information for the first time.
Maybe you could point me to proper place in the archive?
Or maybe you could be more specific instead of blame everyone for
everything?

- and no that is not rude, you have no idea how i sound if i start to get rude

the fact you don't feel being rude does not mean you are not.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.

Reply via email to