> It's good to know that when you reach the same conclusion it is a deliberate > one. > BTW, interfaces are useful for this, but not a necessity. Or am I the only > one thinking that
No, I agree with you mostly. However, I was trying (back then) to define separate dimensions of components (the fact that they can be rendered is one, and for form components for instance, the fact that they can validate is another). If you have a bunch of useful distinctions like that, you can just decorate them for specific purposes. Maybe. > (I seem to be... hmm...). More interfaces mean even more > scrolling through the I's in the javadoc, nooooo, lol. Indeed, it gets ugly pretty fast. Mixins and interfaces with implementations like scala has would be wonderful here, but alas, we'll have to work with Java. Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
