Or with qi4j (http://qi4j.org)
Martijn On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's good to know that when you reach the same conclusion it is a deliberate >> one. >> BTW, interfaces are useful for this, but not a necessity. Or am I the only >> one thinking that > > No, I agree with you mostly. However, I was trying (back then) to > define separate dimensions of components (the fact that they can be > rendered is one, and for form components for instance, the fact that > they can validate is another). If you have a bunch of useful > distinctions like that, you can just decorate them for specific > purposes. Maybe. > >> (I seem to be... hmm...). More interfaces mean even more >> scrolling through the I's in the javadoc, nooooo, lol. > > Indeed, it gets ugly pretty fast. Mixins and interfaces with > implementations like scala has would be wonderful here, but alas, > we'll have to work with Java. > > Eelco > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
