Hmm...  (As an aside, I wonder if they mean "pray in the jungle" or "prey in
the jungle"? :-))

/Gwyn

On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Or with qi4j (http://qi4j.org)
>
> Martijn
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Eelco Hillenius
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It's good to know that when you reach the same conclusion it is a
> deliberate
> >> one.
> >> BTW, interfaces are useful for this, but not a necessity. Or am I the
> only
> >> one thinking that
> >
> > No, I agree with you mostly. However, I was trying (back then) to
> > define separate dimensions of components (the fact that they can be
> > rendered is one, and for form components for instance, the fact that
> > they can validate is another). If you have a bunch of useful
> > distinctions like that, you can just decorate them for specific
> > purposes. Maybe.
> >
> >> (I seem to be... hmm...). More interfaces mean even more
> >> scrolling through the I's in the javadoc, nooooo, lol.
> >
> > Indeed, it gets ugly pretty fast. Mixins and interfaces with
> > implementations like scala has would be wonderful here, but alas,
> > we'll have to work with Java.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to