Could I dig this one back up then ;)

http://www.nabble.com/Creating-Custom-Form-Components-td16159841.html#a1
6159841

Basically my request was to remove final from
FormComponent.add(IValidator...) to aid in creating custom form
component subclasses based on precedent with Component.add(IBehavior...)

-----Original Message-----
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:51 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Making Component easier to Generify

> However, I am *in no way asking* the developers to reverse the "final"
> policy.

We actually relaxed that way more as we felt more confident about
Wicket's API and as motivated requests came in. Personally, I think
using final or not should be a deliberate choice (not automatic). If
you never use it, you can arrive to that evolutionary dead-end pretty
quickly (or indeed will have to break clients all the time), but if
you over-use it, your framework will lack flexibility. Anyway, IF you
stumble upon a final in a place where you'd like to see it go, you can
always send a motivated request for that. We've typically been willing
to remove finals when a good motivation was given.

Eelco

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

______________

The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. 
If you are not the 
intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not 
disclose, 
distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender 
immediately. In addition, 
please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to 
archiving and review by 
persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
_____________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to