Ah, you beat me to that. I should've read the thread entirely before
posting :)
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Or with qi4j (http://qi4j.org)
Martijn
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's good to know that when you reach the same conclusion it is a deliberate
one.
BTW, interfaces are useful for this, but not a necessity. Or am I the only
one thinking that
No, I agree with you mostly. However, I was trying (back then) to
define separate dimensions of components (the fact that they can be
rendered is one, and for form components for instance, the fact that
they can validate is another). If you have a bunch of useful
distinctions like that, you can just decorate them for specific
purposes. Maybe.
(I seem to be... hmm...). More interfaces mean even more
scrolling through the I's in the javadoc, nooooo, lol.
Indeed, it gets ugly pretty fast. Mixins and interfaces with
implementations like scala has would be wonderful here, but alas,
we'll have to work with Java.
Eelco
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
