On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, David Leangen wrote: > Normally, it shouldn't be necessary to have to use casting with > generics. In fact, the idea is that if no casting is used (along with a > few other constraints that I don't remember off hand), then the code is > guaranteed to be type safe. > > In other words... something seems not quite right with the code above > because of the cast. > > > Sorry if I'm bringing up something already discussed. Like I said, I > haven't really been following this thread.
Heh, it sure has :) You can easily check out the previous discussions from Nabble http://www.google.fi/search?q=wicket+nabble+generics&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:unofficial&client=firefox-a To put it short, we're looking for an option where Component could live without the class level type parameter but IModel would have it. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
