I second RFNoC for the B series would be great. They're an incredibly popular and affordable series and I feel a little left out of the capabilities of RFNoC due to the Spartan6. Bringing the Artix to the B-series or supporting the Spartan6 could both be options I'd love to see. (Just a community vote :) )
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Peter Sanchez via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > Thank you > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Ian Buckley <i...@ionconcepts.com> wrote: > >> There is no conceptual reason why you can’t build an RFNoC design on >> B210, it uses the same USRP3 base architecture and FPGA source >> files….*HOWEVER*…. B210 is implemented with a Spartan6 FPGA and all the >> implementation work for RFNoC is done using Xilinx’s Vivado design tools >> which support only the newer FPGA architectures like Zynq (Artix) and >> Kintex…Spartan6 users are stuck with ISE14 forever, so in practical terms, >> no, it’s not possible without you completely recreating all that >> infrastructure. >> >> -Ian >> >> > On Jun 28, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Peter Sanchez via USRP-users < >> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi All, >> > Is it possible to generate RFNoC blocks for the B210? I can't find a >> lot of information about it. Can some one show me the URL if there is a >> website talking about it? >> > >> > Cheers >> > _______________________________________________ >> > USRP-users mailing list >> > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >> > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com > >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
