What I meant and didn't explain well enough is a potential new Ettus
product would be a Zynq-based B2X0 clone. That would be RFNOC-capable.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:32 PM Ian Buckley via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> Errrrr no.
>
> B200 has approximately the same number of FPGA logic gates as E310, B210
> twice that amount.
> The current design is simply larger than it needs to be because it shares
> all it’s code with X300, I could have made it much smaller had there been a
> good reason to.
>
> The FPGA was simply chosen because it was the biggest and newest available
> when that project was begun.
> The Vivado/ISE split wasn’t customer visible at that point in time,
> remember X300 was also ISE based at initial release.
>
> It remains a potent platform for capable FPGA designers to do custom stuff
> on, just not RFNoC.
> -Ian
>
>
> > On Jun 29, 2018, at 1:35 AM, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > To give an uplifting spin to all this:
> >
> > Now, also, although larger than the one on the B200, the B210's FPGA
> > isn't really large unoccupied, so the amount of logic that you could
> > even hypothetically put in there is limited. Why's that uplifiting?
> >
> > That FPGA was chosen for the board because there's usually little need
> > to do anything but the hardware interfacing and the DDC/DUC in the
> > FPGA. The B210 can, with good USB3 controllers, pretty much directly
> > hand through its analog bandwidth to a computer. So, unless you have a
> > workload that your PC including GPU and whatnot can't achieve, you
> > don't even have to think about implementing things on the B210's FPGA –
> > and frankly, I've got no idea what'd be easy to do on the free space of
> > a B210 but impossible on a high-end PC. And a high-end PC is still
> > cheaper than a ISE14 license.
> >
> > Only thing that comes into mind is the latency restrictions you incur
> > with USB; that's really something that no amount of computing power on
> > the host computer side could solve.
> >
> > So, maybe, if I can encourage you to discuss your specific application,
> > we can find a sensible solution on what to put on the SDR peripheral
> > device itself, and what to do on your PC?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Marcus
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 15:56 -0700, Peter Sanchez via USRP-users wrote:
> >> Thank you
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Ian Buckley <i...@ionconcepts.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> There is no conceptual reason why you can’t build an RFNoC design
> >>> on B210, it uses the same USRP3 base architecture and FPGA source
> >>> files….*HOWEVER*…. B210 is implemented with a Spartan6 FPGA and all
> >>> the implementation work for RFNoC is done using Xilinx’s Vivado
> >>> design tools which support only the newer FPGA architectures like
> >>> Zynq (Artix) and Kintex…Spartan6 users are stuck with ISE14
> >>> forever, so in practical terms, no, it’s not possible without you
> >>> completely recreating all that infrastructure.
> >>>
> >>> -Ian
> >>>
> >>>> On Jun 28, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Peter Sanchez via USRP-users <usrp-u
> >>> s...@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi All,
> >>>> Is it possible to generate RFNoC blocks for the B210? I can't
> >>> find a lot of information about it. Can some one show me the URL if
> >>> there  is a website talking about it?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> USRP-users mailing list
> >>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> >>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.co
> >>> m
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> USRP-users mailing list
> >> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> >> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
-- 
Very Respectfully,

Dan CaJacob
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to