>
> I have used the b2x0 radios for some applications myself, we have had no
> luck sampling much higher than 30MS/s. I think real-world USB3 speeds max
> out around 100MB/s.
>
> Will



Thanks Will, that matches my experience. At 28MS/s it tells me I need to
stream at 112MB/s.

You cannot stream faster than about 30Msps from the B210 when in
> dual-channel mode.  This is a limitation of the data bus architecture on  the
> AD9371 chip, and not strictly a limitation of the B2xx FPGA.


Sorry for the misunderstanding. On the B210, I'm in *single channel*, RX
only, and I start having overruns at 28MS/s.

I was just giving my experience with a Lime where I can stream in dual
channel, RX only, at 56MS/s. In that case though the Lime sends its data
back as SC12, meaning it can pack a bit more samples.

FYI, we fixed a couple of sc12/8 related issues on our latest master
> branch. As Marcus says, if you're doing dual channel on the B210, you
> can only go to 30.72 Msps though.
>

Should I play with the OTW format? Does the B210 handle SC12 (
https://files.ettus.com/manual/structuhd_1_1stream__args__t.html mentions *Only
some devices* for SC12).

I tried rx_samples_to_file.exe from
http://files.ettus.com/binaries/uhd/latest_release/Windows7/uhd_3.12.0.0-release_Win32_VS2014.exe
. If I choose SC8, then I can stream faster. It seems I can go up to 49MS/s
without error, over 20 seconds.

At 50MS/s and up I get an error
rx_samples_to_file.exe --null --time 20 --freq 2450e6 --gain 50 --spb 10000
--rate 50e6 --wirefmt sc8
[ERROR] [STREAMER] The receive packet handler caught a value exception.
ValueError: bad vrt header or packet fragment
Error: Receiver error: ERROR_CODE_BAD_PACKET

I modified the code to allow --wirefmt sc12, I also get an error, even at
28MS/s
[ERROR] [STREAMER] The receive packet handler caught a value exception.
ValueError: bad vrt header or packet fragment
but again I'm not sure if the B210 handles that format .

UHD 3.13 is just out, so I tried
http://files.ettus.com/binaries/uhd/uhd_003.013.000.000-release/Windows-7-x86_64/uhd_3.13.0.0-release_Win32_VS2014.exe
. I now get 2850 overruns at 28MS/s in SC16, while I'd get up to 5 with the
previous version. In SC8 I can go up to 40MS/s only, instead of 49. With
the x64 version I get similar results. So for now I reverted back to 3.12.
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to